When you trek into a film called Everest, which is based on true events and stars of slew of well-known actors, you have a pretty good idea what to expect. Probably an expansive drama or tragedy, portraying people at the peak of human endeavor, pushing themselves to the edge. That, Everest delivers. But we’ve seen that before. I feel the need to demand a little more out of this movie.
Starting with the positive, the cast is pretty amazing. I’m a big fan of Jason Clarke, and he’s a great lead, surrounded by about a dozen other excellent actors. No trouble in this camp, they all deliver fine performances - though I’d argue they weren’t given a lot to perform.
The story progresses slowly and predictably for the first half, without a lot of conflict or drama. But in the second half, when things start to go poorly for our climbers, the chain reaction of unfortunate events is effective. I’ll tell ya, I didn’t want to climb a mountain before seeing this film, but now I’m very put off.
Could someone tell Gyllenhaal the mountain's a little higher on the green screen than that? |
But of course, this is a true story being told. Director Baltasar Kormákur likely juggles so much because he simply wants to portray this entire scenario with honesty. Unfortunately I just don’t think it makes excellent drama.
Altogether now, woooaaahh! |
![](./everest-2015-02.jpg) |
Assuming this was shot after Nightcrawler and Southpaw, Gyllenhaal must be hurtin'! |
Everest is the movie you expect it to be, but nothing more, and that left me somewhat disappointed. Good, but not great.